The wisdom of Confucius enlightens. although it usually takes a very long time to figure out the meaning of a select Confucianism, you know the wisdom is there somewhere. But it takes a lot of thinking to figure out the benefits of his wisdom.
The same has been said about client-relationship management technology (CRM). CRM is the term used to describe the technology and practices related to client acquisition, management, marketing and retention. Writing down the name and address of a prospective client, and jotting down some notes about their likes and dislikes or their interests (ie, so they can be leveraged in an effort to win them as a client), is a common practice of CRM. So it is with any practice that helps manage interactions (e-mails, meetings, calls, or letters) with clients intended to increase books of business. There are other support components to CRM, such as marketing to clients and keeping them informed about what the firm offers. In a nutshell, that is CRM. And, while most people understand its benefits, many stay away from implementing CRM technology for very basic reasons.
A Web search on CRM usability yields a number of links — most of them point to software vendors who claim that their software increases or enhances CRM usability. Defining “usability” in this context depicts usability as the ease with which people can employ a particular tool or other human-made object in order to achieve a particular goal. The two primary components of usability — how easy it is to use and how much it enables you to achieve a particular goal — are of tremendous significance as it relates to CRM.
CRM has been the source of great successes and equally publicized failures over the past 15 years. Even when it has been successfully utilized to increase business and strengthen client relationships, organizations and law firms still go through hours of frustrating strategic and business analysis evaluating how to make the best use of CRM. Marketing departments still spend days locked in conference rooms trying to figure out how to capitalize on their firm’s CRM investment through successful events, newsletters and mailings. But, with all these experiences, there has yet to be an organization or practice to have succeeded with a CRM tool that was difficult for their attorneys and staff to use.
To further clarify, note the differences between interaction design and information architecture. Interaction design controls the immediate user experience. It determines how to navigate easily “around” information. It arranges what users see, makes certain that the right access to data is presented in the clearest way, and that it is done with the appropriate emphasis. Mike Kuniavsky, author of the book, Observing the User Experience, says it best when he writes: “Interaction design is different from information architecture in the same way that the design and placement of road signs is different from the process of laying out roads — information architects determine the best path through the terrain, whereas interaction designers place the signs and draw the maps.”
What a great analogy! The best software does, in fact, help people feel familiar in its surroundings. It helps them navigate through a maze of data and screens so they can easily and more productively accomplish more, in less time, with less effort. As it relates to CRM, success comes from making it as invisible as possible to the people who use it. By providing integrated access to critical client information, relationship-exploring capabilities and marketing lists subscriptions, with programs people already use, firms are able to reduce the learning curve often associated with CRM. They also reduce the probability that people will resist using them altogether. Most recently, Microsoft announced the integration of its Dynamics CRM 3.0 product directly into the Outlook interface. By incorporating CRM functionality into the e-mail, calendar events and contact cards people use every day, Microsoft was able to create capabilities that extend the power of Outlook without building new roads that users have to learn to navigate. Another trend that appears to be gaining acceptance within law firms is the use of data portals that leverage tools, such as Microsoft SharePoint, to bring information from various systems to a single screen. Portals make it easy for users to see the information they need, without ever seeing the systems that host it. In both cases, so-called “usability hindrances” are removed. With the usability obstacles out of the way, firms can intensify the focus on an important goal: spending more time exploring revenue opportunities and nourishing relationships with existing clients and firm prospects.
From my article on Law Journal Newsletters © Copyright 2006
0 comments:
Post a Comment